« ABC: Saddam's List | Main | French Corruption Scandals Grow »

Captain's Quarters has moved! Be sure to bookmark or blogroll the new site!

Friday, January 30, 2004

Kerry: Terrorist Threat Exaggerated

Power Line picks up on an interesting Washington Times article on yesterday's Democratic debate, in which the Times manages to catch something that the NY Times buried and the Washington Post completely ignored:

Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts said during last night's Democratic presidential debate that the threat of terrorism has been exaggerated. "I think there has been an exaggeration," Mr. Kerry said when asked whether President Bush has overstated the threat of terrorism. "They are misleading all Americans in a profound way." ...

Sen. John Edwards, who was born in this state and has said he must win here, took the first opportunity to disagree with Mr. Kerry, the victor in both the binding Democratic contests held so far — the Iowa caucuses and the New Hampshire primary. "It's just hard for me to see how you can say there's an exaggeration when thousands of people lost their lives on September 11," Mr. Edwards said.

If there is a better argument for keeping Kerry out of the White House, I'd like to hear it. How typically left-wing is it to claim that the Republicans are exaggerating the threat of foreign attack? It takes us back to the Carter presidency, who shifted American foreign policy from Cold War containment to peaceful and friendly coexistence (famously smooching Brezhnev) -- only to see the peaceful and friendly Soviets overrun Afghanistan.

As Edwards reminded the audience, 3,000 dead Americans on 9/11 wasn't the result of exaggerated threats; it was the result of decades-long minimization of the one-sided Islamofascist war on the West in general and the US in particular. Kerry proposes to take us back to the days of minimization, where we close our eyes to the threats and insist that we spend the "peace dividend" on domestic social engineering. That thinking brought us 9/11.

When we looked at the burning and collapsing towers behind the Statue of Liberty, the smoldering wreck of the Pentagon facade, and the pit made by the heroes of Flight 93 when they thwarted the hijackers, didn't we vow to remember? Did we vow to become vigilant and to take action to make sure that such a thing never happened again? Or did we all decide to write it off as "s**t happens" and assume that the UN will protect us from harm? Kerry's message to the world appears to be the latter.

Now that you have read this post, read the most recent entries at the new Captain's Quarters at http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/!

08:14 AM in Presidential Election | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83455934069e200e5506e4c388833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Kerry: Terrorist Threat Exaggerated:

» The Last Refuge from CALIFORNIA YANKEE
Matthew J. Stinson, in this weeks edition of what has become his weekly review of the Sunday talking head shows, makes this prediction: Easiest prediction of the year: any criticism of any Democrat for any issue related to national defense, [Read More]

Tracked on Feb 1, 2004 1:37:07 PM

Comments

Kerry's answer was just another example of a pseudo liberal opposing Bush, not because Bush is wrong, but because Bush is Bush, and because Bush stands in the way of a Democrat taking power.

Most pseudo liberals now give Bush a pass on hunting down Osama bin Laden because they know they can direct their anti-Bush hysteria against the liberation of Iraq. But if you catch them in the heat of an argument, they'll even look for some reason to give al Qaida a break.

I'll bet almost everyone in blogland has heard that kind of talk. Someone will mention how U.S. forces are pursuing bin Laden, and the pseudo liberal responds by assigning Bush some ulterior motive for the mission. As if any American needs another motive.

In case you haven't caught on, I believe the liberation of Iraq is one of the more courageously liberal acts of the last 50 years. There is no liberalism without liberty, no peace without freedom.

Posted by: Frank Warner at Jan 30, 2004 10:47:26 PM