« Greenspan: Make Tax Cuts Permanent | Main | Globe: Bush AWOL Accusers Lied »

Captain's Quarters has moved! Be sure to bookmark or blogroll the new site!

Friday, February 13, 2004

Get-Tough Policy on Spending Starts With Roads

President Bush, stung by attacks on his spending from his base, drew a line in the sand yesterday when he threatened a veto for a highway-funding package that increased by half over the previous funding bill:

States would get an additional $100 billion over the next six years to build roads, repair bridges and improve public transit under a Senate-passed bill that the White House says is extravagant in an age of record deficits. The Senate voted 76-21 Thursday to approve the $318 billion surface transportation bill, a winning margin that would be enough to override a presidential veto threatened by the administration.

The current six-year highway spending bill, which expires at the end of this month, provided $218 billion.

Bush wants no more than $258 billion spent, which is still a 20% increase from the previous version; spread over six years, that averages close to the rate of inflation. With his base extremely unhappy with spending levels in the past three years, Bush needs to reign in Congress this year to demonstrate some fiscal discipline. But the margin of victory in the Senate is more than enough to override a presidential veto, making this an odd choice for Bush's first-ever veto, if it comes to that. A veto override would make Bush look weak at a time when he most needs to look presidential. He will probably conclude that in a year when he should pick his battles, a tactical retreat on highways may be his best course if he can't negotiate a compromise on the cost.

Now that you have read this post, read the most recent entries at the new Captain's Quarters at http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/!

05:50 AM in Presidential Election | Permalink


TrackBack URL for this entry:

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Get-Tough Policy on Spending Starts With Roads:


I would hope that the GOP senate would realize the importance of allowing a veto of this bill to stand. But then since highway and transportation bills are usually loaded with pork, who knows.

Posted by: James Ph. at Feb 13, 2004 8:50:37 AM

I take back what I said. The GOP senate is a bunch of wimps and worse. If they tried to sustain a Bush veto the Democrats would say "Boo!" and the Republicans would wet themselves.

Posted by: James Ph. at Feb 13, 2004 2:15:24 PM

I received a call this morning from a group called something like the "Republican National Issues Committee".

The call started out asking if I approved of Bush's job performance. I agreed that I did. Then the poor girl started into her spiel about how President Bush really needed my support to continue his conservative agenda.

I stopped her right there and said that as long as the President supported and/or signed into law amnesty for illegal aliens, farm subsidies, steel tarrifs, prescription drug benefits, campaign finance reform, No Child Left Behind, and let his judicial nominees be filibustered, among many other things, that calling his domestic agenda "conservative" was a lie.

Needless to say the call ended rather abruptly.

Posted by: christi at Feb 13, 2004 3:32:19 PM