Captain's Quarters has moved! Be sure to bookmark or blogroll the new site!
Wednesday, December 17, 2003
Review: The Return of the King
For those who have not read the books, this review may contain spoilers; read at your caution.
After taking the day off from work, and from blogging for the most part, I went to the first showing (in daylight hours) of The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King, Peter Jackson's final installment of the trilogy. And all I can say is ...
Brilliant. Brilliant. And brilliant.
Jackson moves at three speeds interchangeably throughout the movie: slow and pensive, normal and tense, and breackneck action. Tolkien's books are full of action -- enormous battles, hand-to-hand combat, desperate rides at great speed ... and you could probably make a two-hour movie of the last book if you just concentrated on that, and never would have to worry about pacing at all. But LotR is more than just a book about war; it's about philosophy, about fear, about love, about friendship, and about finding courage and hope amongst the least of us. Instead of a great action movie, Jackson gives us a true epic by staying as true as possible to the source material.
He blends these different paces in such a way that they seem natural, building through each of the stages in order and back the same way, or so it appeared to me. Even at 3 hours, 20 minutes, the film maintained an incredible sense of tension. Towards the end, I shook in my seat from the constant thrill of it, even though I have read the books a number of times and knew the results. The humor did not go over the top as it did once or twice in the second movie; it was a more natural tension-breaker.
The sheer spectacle of the battle scenes stole my breath, and in these Jackson stayed truest to the sequences in the novels. The marriage of CGI and traditional filmmaking has never been better, and Jackson's imagination of places like Minas Tirith and Osgiliath (as well as Mordor) demonstrates his unique vision and suitability for bringing Tolkien to the screen. Shelob was as menacing and true-to-life as Gollum, who was eerily well crafted and portrayed by Andy Serkis. And the army of the dead stunned me, absolutely floored me.
As far as the actors go, there wasn't a single bad performance. Most compelling were the hobbits, of course, as they are the characters with whom we most identify. Denethor (John Noble) was probably least like my conception of the book; I had thought him as haughty and imperious, not grubby and calculating as Noble portrayed him. Theoden and Eowyn resonated best, after the hobbits. I waited throughout the movie for Eowyn's battle with the Witch King of Angmar, and Miranda Otto did a splendid job of it.
If I have any quibbles, they are minor. Denethor's madness is not well explained, and his death was minus the Palantir. No mention is made of Denethor's mental jousting with Sauron. Saruman never appears in this film, which I realized would happen near the beginning when Gandalf went to Orthanc and declared that Saruman's power had been completely destroyed. The scouring of the Shire was completely left out, but I was fairly sure that would be the case before I ever went to the movie.
But don't let the minor quibbles keep you from appreciating the vast accomplishment of Peter Jackson in bringing this story to the screen at all, let alone in such a masterful way. This installment exceeds all expectations -- find out when the next screening near you is scheduled, and go there now.
Now that you have read this post, read the most recent entries at the new Captain's Quarters at http://www.captainsquartersblog.com/!
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Review: The Return of the King:
» Return of the King review from Strange Women Lying in Ponds
I don't want to read all of it, just yet, as I am afraid of spoilers. But Captain Ed saw Return of the King, today, and has posted a glowing review. [Read More]
Tracked on Dec 17, 2003 10:50:30 PM
» The Twenty-First Century's First Masterpiece from Bow. James Bow.
With the success of Return of the King, the whole Lord of the Rings movie trilogy is nothing less than a masterpiece, especially when you consider the quality, the epic spectacle, the technical wizardry, attention to detail and sheer... [Read More]
Tracked on Dec 24, 2003 10:40:26 AM
Just came here from Instapundit. Looks like a good blog, and have added it to my ever expanding list.
Also, I agree that the film was great, and the parts of the book that were left out, while it would have made it better for True Fans, would have made the move drag a bit for those who have not read the book.
Posted by: Aaron at Dec 18, 2003 1:29:23 AM
Loved it (and saw it at a 12:01 show, to confess my geeekiness).
The left out parts--quite a few of them--will be in the EE. Current run time for the EE is rumored at an additional hour and ten minutes.
I did want to see the Scouring--but I do understand that it's anitclimactic. And I really wish the phrase 'last ship' from the Havens might be eliminated from the final DVD release--anyone who reads the books will find it more satisfying. How else are Sam, Legolas (and all the other elves)and Gimli to get to Tol Erresea?
Posted by: jack at Dec 18, 2003 10:40:53 AM
I concur with all three of the "Brilliants." I'm more disappointed than the rest of yez that PJ skipped the scouring of the Shire. That part seemed crucial to me. Throughout the series the Hobbits were included in the action only through Gandalf's influence. They start clueless and feckless and end up placed where they can (and do) come through in crisis in spite of the condescension of Men. Then, after the epic battles are won with the indispensible aid of the Hobbits' unexpected (especially by them) in extremis courage, they go home...to face Men as enemies with only their own resources to draw upon.
That they triumph, and how they triumph, seemed to me an integral piece of the LOTR story. If PJ adds nothing else to the EE DVD, the scouring and retaking of the Shire should be in there. It's equally important IMHO to the 'last ship' sequence.
Posted by: Ed at Dec 18, 2003 10:47:22 PM